Most migration failures aren’t technical, they’re operational. Teams underestimate dependencies, skip acceptance criteria, and treat cutover like a one-time event instead of a controlled execution. The predictable outcome is weekend fire drills, surprise outages, and stakeholders losing confidence in the cloud program.

The fix is not “more tools.” The fix is discipline: wave planning + validation gates + cutover runbooks. That’s how mature organizations migrate with control.

What “wave planning” actually means

Wave planning is how you group applications and infrastructure into batches that can be migrated, validated, and stabilized with a manageable blast radius. A “wave” is not just a date on a calendar—it’s a defined scope with owners, prerequisites, and acceptance criteria.

Good wave planning optimizes for:

• known dependencies

• manageable risk per wave

• repeatable execution patterns

• learning and improvement between waves

It turns migration from a gamble into a program.

Why migrations go sideways at cutover

These are the top reasons cutovers fail—even in technically competent teams:

1) Unknown dependencies

If you don’t map dependencies, you will cut over and discover:

• apps still calling back to on-prem databases

• batch jobs failing due to missing integrations

• identity/auth paths not updated

• DNS and certificate edge cases

• hidden third-party connections

This is why “it worked in dev” is not a migration strategy.

2) No acceptance criteria (success is vague)

A team that defines success as “the server is up” is setting itself up to fail. Real success is business and operational validation:

• key user workflows work

• integrations work

• performance is acceptable

• monitoring/alerting is in place

• support can operate the environment

If acceptance criteria aren’t agreed before cutover, you’ll argue about “done” at 2:00 a.m.

3) No runbook (execution becomes improvisation)

Runbooks are not documentation theatre. They are operational control. A migration cutover runbook should include:

• prerequisites (access, approvals, maintenance window, comms)

• the exact sequence of steps

• roles and responsibilities (who runs what)

• validation steps (“how we prove it’s good”)

• rollback criteria and rollback steps

• escalation contacts and decision owners

No runbook means you’re relying on tribal knowledge at the worst moment.

4) Wave 1 is too big

Wave 1 is where you prove the motion, not where you take the biggest risk. If you overload wave 1 with mission-critical systems, you won’t learn—you’ll just survive.

A practical migration wave planning model (what to do next)

You can do this without turning it into a six-month analysis program. Here’s a practical execution model.

Step 1: Build an inventory that’s usable

Start with a short list of what’s actually moving. For each system, capture:

• owner

• business criticality

• environment (dev/test/prod)

• data dependencies

• inbound/outbound integrations

• current hosting and constraints

This is not about perfection—it’s about not being blind.

Step 2: Do dependency mapping that matters

Dependency mapping should focus on what breaks cutover:

• database connections and data flows

• identity providers and auth paths

• DNS, certificates, and IP allowlists

• integrations (APIs, message queues, file shares, batch)

• monitoring and logging destinations

• operational tooling (patching, backup/restore, access)

If you can’t confidently describe what a system depends on, it’s not ready for an early wave.

Step 3: Establish readiness gates (“no gate, no wave”)

Before something is allowed into a wave, it should pass basic readiness gates:

• access and owners defined

• target architecture agreed

• cutover method selected

• test plan written

• rollback plan defined

• monitoring/alerts planned

These gates are how you keep the migration program from becoming chaos.

Step 4: Build waves that optimize for learning

A strong wave plan usually looks like:

• Wave 1: low/medium risk, high learning value (prove the process)

• Wave 2: moderate complexity, introduce more dependencies

• Wave 3+: mission critical workloads once the motion is stable

Each wave should be designed so you can stabilize after cutover and incorporate lessons into the next wave.

Step 5: Execute with validation and stabilization time

Every wave should include:

• cutover execution

• validation against acceptance criteria

• stabilization period (monitoring, support readiness, backlog triage)

If you skip stabilization, you push risk into operations and it will surface later as outages or rework.

What good looks like

A well-run migration program has these characteristics:

• every wave has scope, owners, and acceptance criteria

• dependencies are known and documented

• every cutover has a runbook with rollback criteria

• validation is repeatable, not improvised

• lessons learned are captured and applied

That’s how you migrate with control and keep executive confidence.

Ready to migrate without weekend chaos?

If you want a predictable assessment, wave plan, and cutover control motion with clean operational handoff, start here:
Explore AWS Migration Services